Light and mournful, like the omnipresent jazz piano glued under most scenes, Woody Allen’s latest film revisits many of his favourite concerns: the trappings of class, the neurosis of society, the impossibility of love and the gentle meaninglessness of it all. It doesn’t pang as sharp as Annie Hall nor bite as hard as Blue Jasmine but Café Society is charming from beginning to end.
Jesse Eisenberg excels as the Woody Allen archetype Bobby, a nervy fast-talking New Yorker who moves to Hollywood and takes a job running errands for his powerful-agent uncle, Phil (Steve Carell). As much of his work demonstrates, Eisenberg is most comfortable when acting uncomfortable and he brings Allen’s frantic, self-obsessed chatter to life perfectly here. Cooler and self-assured, Kristen Stewart’s Vonnie falls in line with the kooky-aloof love interests of Allen’s oeuvre. Both Bobby and his Uncle Phil are smitten with Vonnie and the drama unfolds from there in a familiarly satisfying-yet-unsatisfying way.
Shot by Vittorio Storaro, the film has a depth of colour and light that really stands out. Most films with this little shadow seem overlit and washed out whereas this has a genuine richness. The sunlight pours gold through windows, the Hollywood exteriors are an even sepia, the night time pool parties have a pretty warm/cool contrast and the New York café scene has the worn coldness of old folk album covers. It’s great to look at and is one of many ingredients that make the film such an easy watch.
Punctuated by the typically tired philosophy and shrugging wit (“live each day as if it’s your last; one day it will be”) of Woody Allen’s late work, Café Society sits neatly in the canon. It is no masterpiece but it is well put together with solid performances and, at 96 minutes, never threatens to outstay its welcome.
The people who make ‘teen comedies’ commit the same crime as those who write ‘children’s novels’. They imagine that to connect with a younger generation they need to somehow ‘come down to their level’, as if there exists a great pyramid of intelligence and experience with adults seated at the top and ‘youths’ rampaging around the lower steps throwing paper aeroplanes and having too much sex.
I don’t know why. Maybe it’s fear, contempt or jealousy. Whatever the reason, all it ends up doing is patronising the audience. And when your audience is the sharpest and most perceptive demographic there is, they sense it immediately.
It’s very rare that a film aimed at late teens/early twenteens gets it right. Scott Pilgrim vs. the World gets it so right. Set in ‘the mysterious land’ of Toronto, Canada, the film follows Scott Pilgrim (Age: 22 Rating: Awesome) as he falls in love with Ramona Flowers and consequently has to defeat her seven evil exes in order to win the right to date her. If that synopsis sounds hyperbolic, that’s because it is based on a series of graphic novels (by Bryan Lee O’Malley).
As such, the film is rife with fantasy, from the exaggerated bloodless violence of the battle scenes to the visual electricity (animated lightning-bolts etc.) emanating from the instruments of live bands.
Nobody could direct this film better than Edgar Wright. Famous for his British comedies with Simon Pegg, Wright’s work often employs a myriad of pop culture references to reflect on the lives of his characters – a generation self-defined by their (our) relationship with the media. One among this generation, Wright understands the Scott Pilgrim character and his hyperactive imagination:
‘I tried to re-capture that feeling… I remember as a teenager having lots of crazy wish fulfillment daydreams and doodling rock bands not unlike sex bob-omb on my schoolbook.’ (full interview here)
Scott’s band’s name, Sex Bob-omb – an inspired choice, any Super Mario fan will agree – highlights the two subcultures dealt with in the film; live rock music and console-gaming. Set in a universe with comic book rules, one can start to see the potential for visual/sonic homage. The tone is established right from the off with an 8-bit version of Universal Studios’ ident, recalling the classic early console games of the 1980s/90s.
And it continues with martial arts, saturated colours and coinage rewards for defeating foes on the visual side and Nintendo motifs, Mac & PC error noises and bass guitar battles on the sonic side.
One of the most unique devices of the film is the text art. Recent comic book adaptations (think Spiderman, Superman and any 1989-present Batman) have avoided this, choosing to focus on realism. Scott Pilgrim embraces it; Kroww, Thok, Pow, Whak all abound in the fight scenes. But its not just onomatopoeic kicks and punches, text is also used to set up scene transitions, commentate on events and subtitle inaudible dialogue for comic effect. Here are my two favourite text art moments:
After ordering a package from amazon.ca (what’s the website for that?) just to have Ramona deliver it, Scott clicks his pen, signs for the package, grabs it, bins it and sets up a date all within less than 4 seconds – one of Edgar Wright’s signature ‘hip hop’ montages. Ending with ‘So Yeah, 8 o’clock?’, the scene cuts straight to snowy night sky emblazoned with the words ‘So Yeah’ and the camera pans down to Ramona waiting for Scott. S.L.Ick.
At the Battle of the Bands, Sex Bob-ombs singer, Stephen Stills becomes panic-stricken when their rival band, Crash and the Boys, start playing. Drowned out by the music, Stephen’s monologue appears as on-screen text. Beginning with whole sentences, the chunks of his speech flash up in smaller pieces as he gets more frantic, quickening the reading pace.
Maybe it can only work this well in films tied in with the comic book aesthetic but it adds such a new dimension that I’d love to see other directors using text creatively in combination with live action.
What tops it all off is the fantastic dialogue which keeps the excitement level high and maintains the film’s high-speed fluidity. The timing of remarks is spot on and every scene bursts with quotable lines. It’s a big part of why Scott Pilgrim vs. the World has gained such a cult following. Listening to songs from the soundtrack on youtube, I stumble upon comments such as this:
And if these go over your head, that’s the idea. Cult films provide a special way for like-minded people to communicate with one another – it’s why the film is so hard to review. The only way to share the experience is to say ‘Watch it’.